Δείτε περισσότερα άρθρα μας στα αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης

The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), which became part of Greece‘s economic landscape in March 2021, is heading toward its final revision before its definitive completion, without any extension. The program concludes on August 31.

Disbursements from the European Union will stop in mid-October, but its economic impact will not end there. The projects and investments that were approved will continue through 2029, maintaining their influence on the economy for several more years.

As the program reaches its conclusion, the key question is no longer how much money Greece received, but what legacy the nearly €36 billion contributed to the country has left behind. Many initiatives that began as pilot programs, reforms that had remained on paper for years, and major projects that had stalled were implemented, creating a lasting legacy for the economy, the state, and society.

The Recovery Fund was born during Europe’s deepest postwar crisis. The pandemic paralyzed economies, strained healthcare systems, and forced governments to spend unprecedented sums to support workers and businesses.

The European Union’s response, with Greece playing a decisive role in the decision-making process, was the creation of NextGenerationEU. For the first time, the EU borrowed collectively from international markets to finance not only the recovery from the pandemic but also the transformation of European economies.

For Greece, this represented a unique opportunity. The revised “Greece 2.0” plan amounts to €35.95 billion, of which €18.22 billion consists of grants and €17.73 billion of low-interest loans, making it proportionally the largest funding package among EU member states.

However, from the outset, the program became the focus of intense political debate and criticism. The opposition has criticized revisions, changes, and what it describes as “discounts” compared with the original “Greece 2.0” plan, as well as the way resources were allocated. It argues that a significant portion of the loans was directed to large companies through banks rather than being distributed “centrally” by the state to small businesses, which have limited access to the banking system.

The Alternate Minister of National Economy and Finance, on the other hand, emphasizes that the resources were fully utilized “down to the last euro” to address long-standing investment gaps, modernize the state, and increase the competitiveness of the economy.